The Iman-Burluk 1, 2 sites and the Botai settlement: the solution to a source-related and historiographical problem

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52967/3007-6528.2025.49.68

Keywords:

Botai, Iman-Burluk 1, Iman-Burluk 2, Botai culture, еneolithic, Kazakh Ishim river region, Northern Kazakhstan, history of study

Abstract

The article focuses on the resolution of a long-standing source-related and historiographical problem in the study of the Eneolithic in North Kazakhstan, concerning the spatial relationship between the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites, studied in 1970 under the direction of L.A. Chalaya, and the Botai settlement, discovered in 1980 and studied in detail under the direction of V.F. Zaibert, which is fundamental to the definition of the Botai culture. The research is based on the analysis of the archaeological excavation reports of the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites and their published results, reports on the discovery and the first field excavations in the Botai settlement, and several published papers on their results. The analysis of the descriptive part and the examination of the graphic documentation of the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites reveal contradictory information about their location. However, the comparison of the topographical plans of the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites and the Botai settlement and the test description of the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites with the topographical situation near the Nikolsko-Burlukskoe landmark suggests that these monuments are a single archaeological site. It was noted that in 1953 L.A. Chalaya mistakenly associated the location of the surface artefact collections of palaeontologist M.D. Biryukov with the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites as one and the same monument. It is better to identify these sites only with the location of the finds, which the geologist G.Yu. Petrenko in 1958. From a historiographical point of view, the beginning of the archaeological exploration of the most important Eneolithic cultural monument of the Ishim region, the Botai settlement, should be dated to 1970, with the excavation of the Iman-Burluk 1 and 2 sites by the North Kazakh team of the Khakass Archaeological Expedition led by L.A. Chalaya. The first discovery of the site dates back to 1958 and was made by the geologist G.Yu. Petrenko. The first characterization of the eneolithic complex, which was later introduced to science as the Botai culture, was made in 1971 in the doctoral thesis of L.A. Chalaya. The NKAE began large-scale archaeological work at the site in 1980 under the direction of V.F. Zaibert.

References

АКК – Археологическая карта Казахстана / Сост.: Е.И. Агеева, К.А. Акишев (отв. ред.), Г.А. Кушаев и др. В 2-х ч. Ч. 1: Реестр. Алма-Ата: АН КазССР, 1960. 449 с.

АКК. Приложение – Археологическая карта Казахстана / Сост.: Е.И. Агеева, К.А. Акишев (отв. ред.), Г.А. Кушаев и др. В 2-х ч. Ч. 2: Карты. Алма-Ата: АН КазССР, 1960. 41 отд. л. в папке: двухцв.; 28×21 см.

Заитов В.И. Характеристика каменных орудий поселения Ботай (предварительный анализ) // Энеолит и бронзовый век Урало-Иртышского междуречья: межвуз. сб. / Отв. ред. С.Я. Зданович. Челябинск: Башкирский гос. ун-т, 1985. С. 17–33.

Зайберт В.Ф. Атбасарская культура. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 1992. 221 с.

Зайберт Ф.В. Энеолит Урало-Иртышского междуречья. Петропавловск: Наука, 1993. 244 с.

Захаров С.В. Изучение памятников энеолита казахстанского Приишимья (1950-е – 1996 гг.) // Археология Казахстана (Қазақстан археологиясы). 2024. № 2 (24). С. 139–159.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 1179: Чалая Л.А. Отчёт о работе Северо-Казахстанского отряда МГУ в Павлодарской и Кокчетавской областях в 1970 г. 27 л.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 1831a: Заитов В.И., Зайберт В.Ф. Отчёт. Полевые исследования СКАЭ в 1980 г. С. 133– 137.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 1831b: Зайберт В.Ф. Отчёт. Полевые исследования СКАЭ в 1980 г. С. 5–108.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 1832: Отчёт. Полевые исследования СКАЭ в 1980 году. Приложение I. 102 с.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 2048: Зайберт В.Ф., Кисленко А.М., Мартынюк О.И., Даниленко Т.А., Плешаков А.А. Отчёт. Полевые исследования СКАЭ в 1984 г. С. 5–94.

НА ИА КН МНВО РК. Д. 2049: Отчёт. Полевые исследования СКАЭ в 1984 г. Приложение I. 73 с.

Чалая Л.А. Неолит Северо-Восточного и Центрального Казахстана: дис. ... канд. ист. наук: 07.00.00. М., 1971. 331 с. + Прил. (29 с.: Альбом ил. 25×31 см).

Чалая Л.А. Поздненеолитический инвентарь и хозяйство стоянки Иман-Бурлук // Археологические исследования в Казахстане / Отв. ред. К.А. Акишев. Алма-Ата: Наука КазССР, 1973. С. 188–203.

Чалая Л.А., Раскина И.А., Войтов В.Е. Результаты работ в Северном Казахстане // АО–1970 / Отв. ред. Б.А. Рыбаков. М.: Наука, 1971. С. 407–408.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

Issue

Section

Tradition and contemporary approaches in archaeological studies

How to Cite

The Iman-Burluk 1, 2 sites and the Botai settlement: the solution to a source-related and historiographical problem. (2025). Margulan Readings, 1(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.52967/3007-6528.2025.49.68

Similar Articles

1-10 of 151

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.